IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Present:
The Honourable Mr. Justice P.K.Balasubramanyan
&
The Honourable Mr. Justice C.N.Ramachandran Nair
Tuesday the 13th day of November, 2001/22nd Karthika, 1923
C.M.P.No.55608/2001 IN O.P.No.18197/2001-N
Forum for the Prevention of Environmental and Sound Pollution
Vs.
State of Kerala and others
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along
with the O.P. the High Court be pleased to clarify that what is intended by,
Rule 5(2) of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2001 the term
"closed premises" is a place like a Cinema hall where there is no escape of any
sound and not "within the compound wall" as stated in Ext.P.5 press release.
This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit
filed in support of O.P. and this courts judgment dated 4-10-2001 and upon
hearing the arguments of Mr.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN, Advocate for the petitioner,
Government Pleader for R1, R3 and R4 and Advocate Mr. Babu Joseph Kuruvathazha
for R2 and R5, the court passed the following:
O R D E R
BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.
1. This is a petition for clarification of the expression "closed premises:
occurring in the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. According
to the petitioner, he was seeking this clarification in view of the press
release issued by the Government as explanatory regarding the use of loud
speakers. According to the petitioner, the press release says that within the
compound of an institution or the building of an institution subject to
restrictions amplifiers can be used at night between 10 P.M. and 6 A.M. This,
according to the petitioner, is against the relevant provisions of the Noise
Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000.
2. The Original Petition was disposed of by us by allowing the same and issuing
certain directions. Subsequently, we also clarified that the directions issued
by us were in addition to and not in substitution of the Noise Pollution
(Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 as amended. Thus, the additional
restrictions placed by the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000
as amended will have to be obeyed by the citizens and by the State. The
situation is, therefore, clear that the State cannot grant any permission
against the terms of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules or
against the directions of this Court in the judgment in O.P.No.9565 of 1988 as
slightly modified in appeal.
3. The present press release of clarification issued by the Government says that
amplifiers could be used during night between 10 at night and 6 in the morning
within the compound of an institution. That must be an institution that is
existing or created permanently for any religious, charitable or other purposes
like cultural, educational and so on. What is meant by "closed premises" in Rule
5 of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules is a matter that has to
be understood in the context of the objects to be achieved by the Rules. The
Supreme Court in the decision in Church of God v. K.K.R. Majestic Colony
Welfare Association (2000(3) KLT 651 (SC) has clearly indicated that the
Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 have to be enforced and the
Rules are enacted in public interest. It is also brought to our notice that
subsequently, when a clarification was sought for, in its order dated 2-11-2001
the Supreme Court observed that it was evident that the prohibition with regard
to use of fire works was only between 10 P.M. and 6 A.M. The restrictions are
placed in the context of Environmental Protection Act and Noise Pollution
(Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. The State, therefore, can obviously permit
the use of amplifiers only in terms of the Rules and strictly in compliance with
the same.
4. The expression "closed premises" occurring in Rule 5 of the Noise Pollution
(Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 is illustrated by Rule 5(2) itself. The
said Rule reads as follows:
"A loud speaker or a public address system shall not be used at night
(between 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.) except in closed premises for communication within,
e.g. auditoria, conference rooms, community halls and banquet halls"
It is not clear whether the attention of the Government was drawn to this Rule
while issuing the press release referred to in this petition. But it is clear
that the press release can be understood only in the context of the above Rule
and cannot be understood as varying, modifying, expanding or restricting the
scope of the above Rule which on its terms appears to be clear.
In that situation, it is only necessary to clarity that any circular or press
release issued by the Government can be understood only consistent with the
relevant provisions of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000
as subsequently amended. With that observation this clarification petition is
closed.
Sd/- [P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN, JUDGE]
Sd/- [C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE]